Relatives' Heartache Regarding Shoreline Erosion Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”
The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.